Jay-Z Rape Accuser Recognizes ‘Some Errors’ in Allegations

The lady who accused billionaire rapper and entrepreneur Jay-Z and disgraced media magnate Sean “Diddy” Combs of raping her when she was once 13 years previous has said that there are inconsistencies in her allegations.

In a brand new interview with NBC Information, the girl, who’s suing as a Jane Doe, stated that “now not the entire faces there are as transparent” in her reminiscences of the incident imagined to have took place 24 years in the past. “So I’ve made some errors,” she instructed the opening. “I can have made a mistake in figuring out.” Then again, Doe stated that she nonetheless stands via her claims total.

The lawsuit, first filed in October within the Southern District of New York, first of all indexed the Roc Country magnate, born Shawn Carter, as an unidentified superstar defendant. Carter was once named within the amended go well with in December and vehemently denied Doe’s claims, accusing the girl’s lawyer, Tony Buzbee, of blackmail within the type of a requirement letter.

“What he had calculated was once the character of those allegations and the general public scrutiny would make me wish to settle,” stated Carter in a observation on the time. “No sir, it had the other impact! It made me wish to disclose you for the fraud that you’re in a VERY public style.”

After interviewing each Doe and her father, NBC identified that whilst she claimed her father picked her up after the alleged sexual attack, he stated he didn’t consider doing that and doesn’t recall riding the greater than 5 hours it will have taken to get from their house to the site of the alleged assault.

Buzbee instructed NBC, “We agree he states he doesn’t consider. His daughter explains that he was once in no state to keep in mind throughout that time limit because of non-public problems he was once having then. We’re speaking a couple of time period greater than twenty years in the past.”

Doe additionally alleged that she spoke to musician Benji Madden on the 2000 MTV Video Song Awards afterparty in New York Town, the place she claimed she was once sexually assaulted. The hole showed that neither Benji nor his brother Joel attended the development that 12 months.

“What’s the clearest is what took place to me and path that I took to what took place to me,” the girl stated.

Consistent with NBC, footage from the evening display Carter and Combs at a location this is other from the only Doe described in her claims. The hole notes that their places for all of the night time aren’t but transparent.

“Lately’s investigative file proves this ‘lawyer’ Buzbee filed a false criticism in opposition to me within the pursuit of cash and popularity,” Carter stated in a observation. “This incident didn’t occur and but he filed it in court docket and doubled down within the press. True Justice is coming. We struggle FROM victory, now not FOR victory. This was once over earlier than it all started. This 1-800 attorney doesn’t comprehend it but, however, quickly.” 

In a observation, Buzbee stated Doe’s case “was once referred to our company via every other legislation company, who vetted it previous to sending it to us.” He added, “Our shopper stays fiercely adamant that what she has said is right, to the most efficient of her reminiscence. We will be able to proceed to vet her claims and accumulate corroborating knowledge to the level it exists. As a result of now we have interrogated her intensely, she has even agreed to post to a polygraph. I’ve by no means had a shopper recommend that earlier than.”

In a letter to Pass judgement on Analisa Torres, Carter’s attorney, Alex Spiro, highlighted the discrepancies in Doe’s allegations and wrote that “those shocking revelations shed light on that the criticism filed via plaintiffs’ lawyer, Anthony Buzbee, subsequently had no factual foundation in any respect.” Spiro referenced Buzbee’s observation and stated, “Even Mr. Buzbee is strolling again the criticism he put his title to — excusing those evident inconsistencies via pointing the finger on the case being referred via every other company who allegedly vetted the tale earlier than sending to them.”