The girl accusing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs of raping her when she was once 13 years outdated has addressed some inconsistencies in her file.
Talking with NBC Information, the lady, whose id stays secure as Jane Doe, mentioned “now not all of the faces are transparent” in her recollection of what came about to her over two decades in the past. She informed NBC, “I’ve made some errors. I could have made a mistake in figuring out.”
NBC quotes Jane Doe and her father, whom they interviewed to fact-check the declare that he picked her up after the alleged attack. Jane Doe says he did, whilst the daddy refutes the ones claims. The file says he doesn’t take note using the greater than 5 hours it will’ve required to get from their house to the positioning of the alleged assault.
“I think like I might remember the fact that, and I don’t,” he mentioned. “I’ve so much happening, however I imply, that’s one thing that might indubitably stick in my thoughts.”
Referring to her father’s feedback, Jane Doe’s lawyer, Tony Buzbee, is quoted telling NBC Information, “We agree he states he doesn’t take note. His daughter explains that he was once in no state to keep in mind right through that time limit because of non-public problems he was once having then. We’re speaking a couple of period of time greater than two decades in the past.”
The girl additionally claims she spoke to musician Benji Madden on the 2000s VMAs after-party the place she mentioned she was once sexually assaulted, however NBC showed that neither Benji nor his brother Joel attended the 2000 VMAs.
“What’s the clearest is what came about to me and path that I took to what came about to me,” the lady mentioned. A number of the different inconsistencies addressed are the positioning of the attack, even if the precise whereabouts for all the night time stay unclear.
In flip, Jay-Z has launched his personal remark and an extra remark from his legal professional.
“This ‘lawyer’ Buzbee filed a false grievance towards me within the pursuit of cash and popularity,” wrote Jay-Z. “This incident didn’t occur and but he filed it in court docket and doubled down within the press. True Justice is coming. We struggle FROM victory, now not FOR victory. This was once over earlier than it all started. This 1-800 legal professional doesn’t understand it but, however, quickly.”
Jay-Z’s legal professional Alex Spiro shared his remark by the use of Roc Country. “It’s surprising {that a} legal professional would now not most effective report any such severe grievance with out correct vetting, however would make issues worse through additional peddling this false tale within the press,” mentioned Spiro. “We’re asking the Court docket to disregard this frivolous case as of late, and can take in the topic of extra self-discipline for Mr. Buzbee and all of the legal professionals that filed the grievance.”
Buzbee informed NBC his consumer is in “excessive misery,” and has been experiencing seizures because of the tension. “Jane Doe’s case was once referred to our company through every other, who vetted it previous to sending it to us,” he mentioned. “Our consumer stays fiercely adamant that what she has mentioned is right, to the most productive of her reminiscence. We can proceed to vet her claims and gather corroborating information to the level it exists. As a result of we now have interrogated her intensely, she has even agreed to publish to a polygraph. I’ve by no means had a consumer counsel that earlier than.”
“In any tournament,” he concluded, “we at all times do our absolute best to vet every declare made, simply as we did on this case.”
Representatives for Buzbee Regulation Company didn’t reply to Selection‘s request for remark.
Discover more from The Mass Trust
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
